This page was last edited at 1725 Hrs GMT London Saturday 16 August 2008
This document, in common with ALL Khoodeelaar! items as pub;shed either by AADHIKAR MEDia Foundation on AADHIKARonline web pages or sites or blogs or as published in the CBRUK system or by KHOODEELAAR! itself, constitute original legal and constitutional law work by KHOODEELAAR! and these are published for utterly educational and information purposes only. In the context of the KHOODEELAAR! legal and constitutional law action, they also constitute the relevant evidence of publishing of the materials and their implications. No part of these must be assumed to be exempt from the requirements of copyrights and intellectual property and authoring rights as p;lic able in the YUK and internationally. Any external contribution or material that may be referred to in any of the AADHIKARonline or KHOODEELAAR! or associated web site or blog publications is very clearly acknowledged very fully identified and very prominently sourced.
ALL IPR and copyrights and authoring queries, as well as all queries about the legal and constitutional law action programme against Crossrail hole agenda -peddlers, backers and 'supporterts', must initially sent to
lawmedia@hotmail.com
________________________________________________
These evidential updates being published on the internet by Khoodeelaar! for the exercise of the highest standard physically possible of transparency in the work of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law, ethical and legal acton against the wrongdoers whom KHOODEELAAR! has throughout been giving ample, adequate, timely and reaped opportunities for them to correct their wrongs...
The named councillors in the campaign against the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council include the ones listed at the time of their particular pro-Crossrail hole agenda roles . They may or may not be CURRENTLY on the same London Borough of Tower Hamlets council., So the evidence shows that the following councillors have played roles that on the evidence, have been as agents of the Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London and contrary to the objectively verifiable demand, preference and need as voiced, felt and expressed by members of the community of the past 56 months of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Crossrail hole scam.
The councillors who have made statements AT the relevant times as 'councillors' or as being DESCRIBED AS COUNCILLORS WHEN making the statements st that have been made as OPPOSITE parties to that represented by the KHOODEELAAR! Champaign against the Crossrail hole plot, have included the following:-
1. Keith, Michael
2. Helal/Abbas, Helal, Uddin, Abbas [these parts of the name are arranged here in this way in view of the conflicting records found by the KHOODEELAAR! investigators of the same individual using different arrangements and words of names at different times since they first got elected to the same Council]
3. Rahman, Akikur
4. Ahmed, Ohid
[To be continued]
TWO main items, relvant to the aboive, are republished below from the AADHIKARonline and KHOODEELAAR! archives 2006 and 2007
_________________________________________________________________________________________
"Friday, August 31, 2007
Muhammad Haque examining the evidence of the role played by Tower Hamlets Councillors on Crossrail hole-1
Action archives of the Khoodeelaar! The ‘No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign - evidence of legal questioning of two Tower Hamlets Councillors who had made unsubstantiated claims on a satellite TV channel suggesting that they had opposed the Crossrail hole. 18 months and more since those questions the two individuals have remained unable to answer the Khoodeelaar!
Questions
August 31st, 2007 by khoodeelaar
These texts have been checked at 1835 Hrs GMT on Friday 31 August 2007
Muhammad Haque: 1400 Hrs GMT London Friday 31 August 2007:
Khoodeelaar! Action update and commentary on the Crossrail hole-inviting role by Tower Hamlets Councillors [as played in 2006 and previously to that year].
By©Muhammad Haque 1430 Hrs GMT
London Friday 31 August 2007
Khoodeelaar! Action update and commentary on the Crossrail hole-inviting role by Tower Hamlets Councillors.
Part 1
[This is a three-part review. The two later parts will appear over the weekend]
KHOODEELAAR! put [on 5 February 2006] a series of evidential questions about the Tower Hamlets Council’s role in inviting and tolerating the Crossrail hole collusion against the East End of London to two councillors, both of those councillors identifiable as of Bangladeshi identify and origin, one still a councillor, the other not.
The one who is still a councillor, had been the Council’s ‘leader’ until he was replaced in 2005-2006 following the emergence of the Khoodeelaar! Movement against the Crossrail hole threat.
The other is not a councillor any longer, having lost his seat in the Bethnal green South WARD at the 4 May 2006 local elections.
The first one is Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ [for the Council Ward that includes the site in the middle of Hanbury Street and Princelet Street of the Crossrail hole attack, off Brick Lane] and the second one is Akikur Rahman [councillor until 3 May 2006 for the Bethnal Green South ward, that includes the Woodeham gardens, Castlemain Street, Lomas Street and Traharne [check that word] Close off the Vallance Road, the streets that are targeted for smaller digging and rubbish causing programme by Crossrail as part of their ‘Crossrail station’ at Whitechapel Road round the corner]
Formally they are members of the former Labour Party [as Blaired since 1994-95] and the Lib Dems party in that order.
But when they appeared on a programme as broadcast on the Channel S station, that is carried on Rupert Murdoch’s satellite TV transmission network via SKY
Khoodeelaar! Quoting on Friday 31 August 2007 the Khoodeelaar! Item as posted on 5 February 2006 on the internet and also published on the UK Indymedia on 5 February 2006
“
© The Author /KHOODEELAAR !/ CBRUK /LAWMEDIA | 05.02.2006 00:00 | Analysis | Social Struggles | London | World The KHOODEELAAR !campaign in defence of the Brick Lane E1 area and against the Crossrail hole has created the hottest political debate in the East End of London and beyond.
The result is that sitting councillors on Tower Hamlets are now running desperate to keep their careers. They are now under pressure to tell the truth on how they let the Crossrail hole to be brought to attack the community © The Author /KHOODEELAAR !/ CBRUK /LAWMEDIA
KHOODEELAAR! THE BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL has today put the following members of Tower Hamlets Council on notice that evidence in legal substantiation of claims they both made on a broadcast programme [26 January 2006] about their roles in opposing the Crossrail hole plan, would be demanded as part of the legal action in defence of the community that the KHOODEELAAR !campaign has been preparing.
The councillors are
Cllr Akikur Rahman and Cllr Helal Abbas
The extracts from the letter to them sent by KHOODEELAR on Saturday 4 February 2006 reads as follows,
“Dear Councillors Rahman and Abbas
You both made statements on a TV programme on a satellite TV Channel [‘Channel S’] which was broadcast on 26 January 2006 in which you both claimed, in your own ways, that both of you had supported the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole plan/ scheme.
We have studied the contents of the rest of what you stated.
For now, we are putting this question to you both, and formally asking you to substantiate the assertions you made.
This is being put to you on legal advice.
Cllr Akikur Rahman said that he had been actively concerned about the need to let the community know for the past more than two years.
The question to Cllr Akikur Rahman on that assertion is this:
“Who did you speak to or write to or otherwise communicate with in the community ands on what date and with what result and with what evidence?
When you spoke at the meeting held at the Brady Centre on 22 January 2006, did you know that your statement would be subject to verification?
We are asking you on behalf of the KHOODEELAAR !the BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE to give us the answers to all the elements of the question here and to do so by not later than 1000 Hrs on Tuesday 7 February 2006.
You must know that the recorded evidence of the Liberal Democratic Party is FOR the Crossrail plan including the hole plan and there is no evidence whatever anywhere so far that the Liberal Democratic Party on Tower Hamlets Council has supported the community in the opposition to the Crossrail hole.
Your reference to consultation is a diversionary one and given that you made that statement on a date after 22 January 2006 shows that you are less concerned about telling the truth than making a Party political point.
If we have got this factually wrong, please point to us what facts we have got wrong and we shall amend this statement. If we don’t get the evidence from you then you alone will be held responsible fro among the misleading statement that you have made on the matter in the two statements that we have referred to about your utterances.
Cllr Helal Abbas:
You claimed that the “Opposition” on the Council was not about real policy or action. We note that just for context. You said that no Labour councillor was in favour of the hole.
We are challenging you ion this on the facts.
Your entire record, as far as has been available on the public domain, is in conflict with your claim.
Your comments against the KHOODEELAAR !campaigners, as reported in the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER on Thursday 28 October 2004, is also in conflict with your claim as made on Channel S as broadcast on 26 January 2006.
Do you agree or disagree?
If you agree then you must apologise to the community and withdraw the untruthful ones of your statements from the two sets we have referred to here.
If you disagree then you must provide evidence in support of your continuing claim.
In either case, whatever you say will be included in evidence by KHOODEELAAR! in the matter in our application to court and in our submission to the UK House of Commons and the UK House of Lords in due course.
Your only opportunity to discharge your duty to tell the truth and nothing but the truth is now and until 1000 Hrs ON Tuesday 7 February 2006.
Yours faithfully
LAWMEDIA
THE legal AFFAIRS UNIT_KHOODEELAAR !_The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill 2006-02-04 2352 Hrs GMT_Saturday 4 February 2006”
The Legal e-mail address for Khoodeelaar! is as follows
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Friday, August 31, 2007
Muhammad Haque examining the evidence of the role played by Tower Hamlets Councllors on Crossrail hole-1
Action archives of the Khoodeelaar! The ‘No to Crossrail hole Bill’ campaign - evidence of legal questioning of two Tower Hamlets Councillors who had made unsubstantiated claims on a satellite TV channel suggesting that they had opposed the Crossrail hole. 18 months and more since those questions the two individuals have remained unable to answer the Khoodeelaar! Questions
August 31st, 2007 by khoodeelaar
These texts have been checked at 1835 Hrs GMT on Friday 31 August 2007
Muhammad Haque: 1400 Hrs GMT London Friday 31 August 2007: Khoodeelaar! Action update and commentary on the Crossrail hole-inviting role by Tower Hamlets Councillors [as played in 2006 and previously to that year].
By©Muhammad Haque1430 Hrs GMT
London Friday 31 August 2007
Khoodeelaar! Action update and commentary on the Crossrail hole-inviting role by Tower Hamlets Councillors.
Part 1
[This is a three-part review. The two later parts will appear over the weekend]
KHOODEELAAR! put [on 5 February 2006] a series of evidential questions about the Tower Hamlets Council’s role in inviting and tolerating the Crossrail hole collusion against the East End of London to two councillors, both of those councillors identifiable as of Bangladeshi identify and origin, one still a councillor, the other not.
The one who is still a councillor, had been the Council’s ‘leader’ until he was replaced in 2005-2006 following the emergence of the Khoodeelaar! Movement against the Crossrail hole threat.
The other is not a councillor any longer, having lost his seat in the Bethnal green South WARD at the 4 May 2006 local elections.
The first one is Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ [for the Council Ward that includes the site in the middle of Hanbury Street and Princelet Street of the Crossrail hole attack, off Brick Lane] and the second one is Akikur Rahman [councillor until 3 May 2006 for the Bethnal Green South ward, that includes the Woodeham gardens, Castlemain Street, Lomas Street and Traharne [check that word] Close off the Vallance Road, the streets that are targeted for smaller digging and rubbish causing programme by Crossrail as part of their ‘Crossrail station’ at Whitechapel Road round the corner]
Formally they are members of the former Labour Party [as Blaired since 1994-95] and the Lib Dems party in that order.
But when they appeared on a programme as broadcast on the Channel S station, that is carried on Rupert Murdoch’s satellite TV transmission network via SKY
Khoodeelaar! Quoting on Friday 31 August 2007 the Khoodeelaar! Item as posted on 5 February 2006 on the internet and also published on the UK Indymedia on 5 February 2006
“
© The Author /KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK /LAWMEDIA | 05.02.2006 00:00 | Analysis | Social Struggles | London | World The KHOODEELAAR campaign in defence of the Brick Lane E1 area and against the Crossrail hole has created the hottest political debate in the East End of London and beyond. The result is that sitting councillors on Tower Hamlets are now running desperate to keep their careers. They are now under pressure to tell the truth on how they let the Crossrail hole to be brought to attack the community © The Author /KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK /LAWMEDIA
KHOODEELAAR! THE BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL has today put the following members of Tower Hamlets Council on notice that evidence in legal substantiation of claims they both made on a broadcast programme [26 January 2006] about their roles in opposing the Crossrail hole plan, would be demanded as part of the legal action in defence of the community that the KHOODEELAAR campaign has been preparing.
The councillors are
Cllr Akikur Rahman and Cllr Helal Abbas
The extracts from the letter to them sent by KHOODEELAR on Saturday 4 February 2006 reads as follows,
“Dear Councillors Rahman and Abbas
You both made statements on a TV programme on a satellite TV Channel [‘Channel S’] which was broadcast on 26 January 2006 in which you both claimed, in your own ways, that both of you had supported the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole plan/ scheme.
We have studied the contents of the rest of what you stated.
For now, we are putting this question to you both, and formally asking you to substantiate the assertions you made.
This is being put to you on legal advice.
Cllr Akikur Rahman said that he had been actively concerned about the need to let the community know for the past more than two years.
The question to Cllr Akikur Rahman on that assertion is this:
“Who did you speak to or write to or otherwise communicate with in the community ands on what date and with what result and with what evidence?
When you spoke at the meeting held at the Brady Centre on 22 January 2006, did you know that your statement would be subject to verification?
We are asking you on behalf of the KHOODEELAAR the BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE to give us the answers to all the elements of the question here and to do so by not later than 1000 hrs on Tuesday 7 February 2006.
You must know that the recorded evidence of the Liberal Democratic Party is FOR the Crossrail plan including the hole plan and there is no evidence whatever anywhere so far that the Liberal Democratic Party on Tower Hamlets Council has supported the community in the opposition to the Crossrail hole.
Your reference to consultation is a diversionary one and given that you made that statement on a date after 22 January 2006 shows that you are less concerned about telling the truth than making a Party political point.
If we have got this factually wrong, please point to us what facts we have got wrong and we shall amend this statement. If we don’t get the evidence from you then you alone will be held responsible fro among the misleading statement that you have made on the matter in the two statements that we have referred to about your utterances.
Cllr Helal Abbas:
You claimed that the “Opposition” on the Council was not about real policy or action. We note that just for context. You said that no Labour councillor was in favour of the hole.
We are challenging you ion this on the facts.
Your entire record, as far as has been available on the public domain, is in conflict with your claim.
Your comments against the KHOODEELAAR campaigners, as reported in the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER on Thursday 28 October 2004, is also in conflict with your claim as made on Channel S as broadcast on 26 January 2006.
Do you agree or disagree?
If you agree then you must apologise to the community and withdraw the untruth ones of your statements from the two sets we have referred to here.
If you disagree then you must provide evidence in support of your continuing claim.
In either case, whatever you say will be included in evidence by KHOODEELAAR in the matter in our application to court and in our submission to the UK House of Commons and the UK House of Lords in due course.
Your only opportunity to discharge your duty to tell the truth and nothing but the truth is now and until 1000 Hrs ON Tuesday 7 February 2006.
Yours faithfully
LAWMEDIA_
THE legal AFFAIRS UNIT_Khoodeelaar !_The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill 2006-02-04 2352 Hrs GMT_Saturday 4 February 2006”
The Legal e-mail address for Khoodeelaar! is as follows
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
August 31st, 2007 by khoodeelaar
These texts have been checked at 1835 Hrs GMT on Friday 31 August 2007
Muhammad Haque: 1400 Hrs GMT London Friday 31 August 2007: Khoodeelaar! Action update and commentary on the Crossrail hole-inviting role by Tower Hamlets Councillors [as played in 2006 and previously to that year].
By©Muhammad Haque1430 Hrs GMT
London Friday 31 August 2007
Khoodeelaar! Action update and commentary on the Crossrail hole-inviting role by Tower Hamlets Councillors.
Part 1
[This is a three-part review. The two later parts will appear over the weekend]
KHOODEELAAR! put [on 5 February 2006] a series of evidential questions about the Tower Hamlets Council’s role in inviting and tolerating the Crossrail hole collusion against the East End of London to two councillors, both of those councillors identifiable as of Bangladeshi identify and origin, one still a councillor, the other not.
The one who is still a councillor, had been the Council’s ‘leader’ until he was replaced in 2005-2006 following the emergence of the Khoodeelaar! Movement against the Crossrail hole threat.
The other is not a councillor any longer, having lost his seat in the Bethnal green South WARD at the 4 May 2006 local elections.
The first one is Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ [for the Council Ward that includes the site in the middle of Hanbury Street and Princelet Street of the Crossrail hole attack, off Brick Lane] and the second one is Akikur Rahman [councillor until 3 May 2006 for the Bethnal Green South ward, that includes the Woodeham gardens, Castlemain Street, Lomas Street and Traharne [check that word] Close off the Vallance Road, the streets that are targeted for smaller digging and rubbish causing programme by Crossrail as part of their ‘Crossrail station’ at Whitechapel Road round the corner]
Formally they are members of the former Labour Party [as Blaired since 1994-95] and the Lib Dems party in that order.
But when they appeared on a programme as broadcast on the Channel S station, that is carried on Rupert Murdoch’s satellite TV transmission network via SKY
Khoodeelaar! Quoting on Friday 31 August 2007 the Khoodeelaar! Item as posted on 5 February 2006 on the internet and also published on the UK Indymedia on 5 February 2006
“
© The Author /KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK /LAWMEDIA | 05.02.2006 00:00 | Analysis | Social Struggles | London | World The KHOODEELAAR campaign in defence of the Brick Lane E1 area and against the Crossrail hole has created the hottest political debate in the East End of London and beyond. The result is that sitting councillors on Tower Hamlets are now running desperate to keep their careers. They are now under pressure to tell the truth on how they let the Crossrail hole to be brought to attack the community © The Author /KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK /LAWMEDIA
KHOODEELAAR! THE BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL has today put the following members of Tower Hamlets Council on notice that evidence in legal substantiation of claims they both made on a broadcast programme [26 January 2006] about their roles in opposing the Crossrail hole plan, would be demanded as part of the legal action in defence of the community that the KHOODEELAAR campaign has been preparing.
The councillors are
Cllr Akikur Rahman and Cllr Helal Abbas
The extracts from the letter to them sent by KHOODEELAR on Saturday 4 February 2006 reads as follows,
“Dear Councillors Rahman and Abbas
You both made statements on a TV programme on a satellite TV Channel [‘Channel S’] which was broadcast on 26 January 2006 in which you both claimed, in your own ways, that both of you had supported the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole plan/ scheme.
We have studied the contents of the rest of what you stated.
For now, we are putting this question to you both, and formally asking you to substantiate the assertions you made.
This is being put to you on legal advice.
Cllr Akikur Rahman said that he had been actively concerned about the need to let the community know for the past more than two years.
The question to Cllr Akikur Rahman on that assertion is this:
“Who did you speak to or write to or otherwise communicate with in the community ands on what date and with what result and with what evidence?
When you spoke at the meeting held at the Brady Centre on 22 January 2006, did you know that your statement would be subject to verification?
We are asking you on behalf of the KHOODEELAAR the BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE to give us the answers to all the elements of the question here and to do so by not later than 1000 hrs on Tuesday 7 February 2006.
You must know that the recorded evidence of the Liberal Democratic Party is FOR the Crossrail plan including the hole plan and there is no evidence whatever anywhere so far that the Liberal Democratic Party on Tower Hamlets Council has supported the community in the opposition to the Crossrail hole.
Your reference to consultation is a diversionary one and given that you made that statement on a date after 22 January 2006 shows that you are less concerned about telling the truth than making a Party political point.
If we have got this factually wrong, please point to us what facts we have got wrong and we shall amend this statement. If we don’t get the evidence from you then you alone will be held responsible fro among the misleading statement that you have made on the matter in the two statements that we have referred to about your utterances.
Cllr Helal Abbas:
You claimed that the “Opposition” on the Council was not about real policy or action. We note that just for context. You said that no Labour councillor was in favour of the hole.
We are challenging you ion this on the facts.
Your entire record, as far as has been available on the public domain, is in conflict with your claim.
Your comments against the KHOODEELAAR campaigners, as reported in the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER on Thursday 28 October 2004, is also in conflict with your claim as made on Channel S as broadcast on 26 January 2006.
Do you agree or disagree?
If you agree then you must apologise to the community and withdraw the untruth ones of your statements from the two sets we have referred to here.
If you disagree then you must provide evidence in support of your continuing claim.
In either case, whatever you say will be included in evidence by KHOODEELAAR in the matter in our application to court and in our submission to the UK House of Commons and the UK House of Lords in due course.
Your only opportunity to discharge your duty to tell the truth and nothing but the truth is now and until 1000 Hrs ON Tuesday 7 February 2006.
Yours faithfully
LAWMEDIA_
THE legal AFFAIRS UNIT_Khoodeelaar !_The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill 2006-02-04 2352 Hrs GMT_Saturday 4 February 2006”
The Legal e-mail address for Khoodeelaar! is as follows
lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)